The “about me”-page is one of the most overlooked pages in development and one of the highest ranked pages on many websites. In a world that’s becoming increasingly connected through the Web, it’s important that you engage your audience in a personal and friendly way, otherwise you risk just being another faceless web designer among a sea of websites.
We had to go through hundreds of sites to come up with the following list. It seems most designers and developers run out of steam by the time they got around to developing their about pages. Most designers we came across simply threw up a few hastily written words about themselves instead of treating the page as an important asset. Others, however, have truly taken the time to treat their about page as if it were important as the home page. In fact, some went as far as using their about pages as their home page.
We present 60 beautiful and effective about pages that engage users and neatly present their designers. We also examine the growing trend of Business Card Websites (BCW’s).
A great way to distinguish yourself from the crowd is to have a truly unique about page.
Dustin Curtis has taken a truly unique approach to the about page. What he has created is a death clock of sorts; a timeline of his life up until now and to beyond. It’s an about page that truly speaks to the designer’s capabilities and creativity. It accomplishes the most important thing about a website and a great about page - it’s something you won’t soon forget.
While the content is slight, the “Floating Asian Kid” gag below is cute. Move your mouse around the graphic to see why. It is both memorable and unique
Quomo has taken a very unique approach to the about page - a series of full-body action shots on a horizontal carousel.
Jared has taken a very clever approach to the self portrait (quite literally).
Mark has put his face on Mount Rushmore.
Guðmundur has used big typography and an interesting perspective for his portrait.
A large photograph of yourself can leave a lasting impression in your users minds if it’s done well.
The more we use computers to communicate, the less face-to-face interaction we get. This is why David DeSandro’s about page is so effective. His headshot is as big as any I’ve seen on an about page makes you really feel as thought you’re meeting a real person rather than some web designer on some website. Once the introduction is made, you can easily connect up with David via his social networking presence or the handy contact form below his picture. It’s worth noting his about page is well organized as well.
Janis’ about page is short on copy but big on artistic design. You get a good impression in short order.
Subtraction.com, in addition to being one of the coolest domain names ever, is a picture perfect study in minimalism. Khoi chose an incredible picture for his about page and organized his biography into an easily digested format. It doesn’t hurt that he threw his adorable black lab in there for good measure.
Aside from having an incredibly awesome domain name (unstoppablerobotninja.com), Ethan has a great about page too.
The best about pages we found were the ones that had a lot of information but were excellently organized, making them easily digestible. When faced with the task of creating an about page, it’s easy to get overwhelmed and put it off indefinitely because the subject you are dealing with is yourself. It is a subject we know more about than anything else and it can be difficult to know just how much and how little we should tell the world about ourselves. A good about page must be informative without being too wordy.
Jason is Creative Director for A List Apart and it’s clear why. He has pioneered the idea of the “fast design direction” approach to updating websites, a method where instead of doing a major re-design of a site after a long period of time, each article or update gets its own unique design. David and Dustin from above use the same sort of system. Jason’s about page is clean, organized, and personable. We can see at a glance what he has written elsewhere, what he’s about, and what he’s capable of.
Joseph makes sure to give thanks and credit where it’s due on his about page.
The 2-column layout used by Travis neatly encapsulates everything about who he is and what he does. You can easily scan for the information you need.
SimpleBits has always been an inspiration to many web designers and it’s no surprise Dan Cederholm’s about page is one of the best organized and informative out there.
Jon Tangerine is a master of typography. The first time I visited his site I was amazed at what he was able to accomplish without the help of sIFR or other font rendering engines. His about page is a joy to view. Every section is deliberate, informative, and attractive.
Douglas Bowman is a creative director for Twitter and has been working on the web for as long as its been around. His about page is succinct and entertaining. We as graphic designers get exactly what we want in the section devoted to previous design iterations of his website over the years. Check out his footer when you’re on the about page, too, for a bit of cleverness.
Bubs has quite a lot of information but it’s neatly categorized and amusing.
Some designers have gone as far as making their about pages their home pages.
Toby’s about page is actually his home page, which for a personal website (and formal name as his domain name) is a great idea. After all, if we’re visitng Toby’s site for the first time it’d be nice to know who the designer is. He also flips the large portrait concept on its head by giving us a large silhouette where it’s supposed to be.
Jason Reed uses an excellent hand drawn illustration portrait as his about page centerpiece, and his about page in turn is his website’s centerpiece and the first thing you see when you land on jasonreedwebdesign.com. His professional details are neatly organized into a horizontal accordian and there’s no fluff - just the most important information one might want to know when considering Jason for a freelance project.
This website is hard to ignore not only because of its striking yellow background, but Bjørn’s organization of information.
Vlad has a very distinct goal in mind with his site and he accomplishes it with great typography and layout.
Kyle pokes fun at the traditional folio site with his one-page offering. You can easily find out all about him and his internet presence.
A few of the about pages had very deliberate goals.
Jonny gets straight to the point with a mission statement and a brief summary of who he is.
Nick has created an extremely professional about page, complete with testemonials, great portrait, and a press kit to boot.
Suzy sums up herself up well in one sentence, goes into depth for those who are interested, and gives straightforward information about her capabilities and availability.
Dan has a clever portrait and a great succinct description of his talents and abilities complete with his resume and a link to contact him.
A minimalist approach can be a great way to convey important information about yourself without distracting the user.
Garret actually acknowledges the fact that his about page is more popular than he first thought it would be, citing this as the reason for giving it more attention.
A few of the about pages we found were actually accessible not from a traditional page but an ajax driven drop-down modal. It’s a great way to make the information about yourself easily accessible to anyone from any page without forcing users to navigate away from the page their currently reading.
Brynn’s about page is always easily accessible via a drop down effect. This also doubles as her contact form.
Made By Elephant’s Tim Van Damme recently started a trend he coined Business Card Websites (BCW), or specialized contact/about pages for individuals that are heavy on ajax and great design. Once Tim got his BCW online other designers started following suit. BCW’s are a great place to send people if they want to get an overview of your social networking presence, portfolio and capabilities, contact information, etc. We have a feeling we’re going to start seeing more of these pop up in the near future. Here are a few of the best we’ve found so far:
Tim has three tabs on this BCW which tell you how to find him on the net, who he is, and how to get in touch with him.
Rogie King runs Komodo Media, and his BCW retains some of the design elements he uses there. Great consistency.
Michael’s BCW has a stunning underwater effect with appealing organic treatments.
Matthias blogs over at kremalicious.com and has also chosen to keep his design consistent across his BCW.
Daniel has taken a minimalistic approach that works quite well. It’s clean, simple, to-the-point, and friendly.
There you have it: 60 beautiful and effective about pages from personal websites, blogs, and portfolios. Hopefully this will inspire you to revisit their about pages and come up with some unique and innovative ways of representing yourself on the web.
Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.
© Mark Nutter for Smashing Magazine, 2009. |
Permalink |
80 comments |
Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble on StumbleUpon! | Tweet it! | Submit to Reddit | Forum Smashing Magazine
Post tags: about, design, portfolio, showcases
1 July 2009, 11:22 am
Testing the usability of your site is one of the smartest things you can do. Usability involves making a website’s interface easier to use and simpler to understand, so that the user’s experience is as enjoyable as possible.
The more usable a site is, the more satisfying it will be to interact with it — and happy visitors translate into happy customers.
Ideas about what makes for the best website design don’t always translate perfectly when put into practice. Elements that one person might consider easy to use may actually turn out to be confusing for someone else.
In this article, we’ll review 10 tools that you can use to improve your website’s usability even if you’re on a low budget.As designers and developers, we have a natural bias towards the way our own products function: we built them, so we know exactly how they work.
Our visitors, however, don’t have this advantage. This means that testing for usability is the only reliable way to find out how well a website works.
Usability testing allows you to discover many ways in which your site can be improved.
Usability testing may sound daunting, but in reality, a small investment can yield large gains. Jacob Nielsen, one of the best-known usability gurus, says:
“The best results come from testing no more than 5 users and running as many small tests as you can afford.”
- Jacob Nielsen (Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users)
That’s right. Just 5 users will provide enough results to help you make effective updates to your website. While you could test with 15 users to find most or all problem areas on your site, testing with just 5 will uncover 85% of issues, which gives you the most value for your money.
Other trouble spots can be identified by testing a subsequent round of users, and with each additional test, the number of issues uncovered will decrease.
It’s important to note that the very first usability test offers the greatest insight. Even a small amount of testing can yield significant results and reveal big issues and problem areas early on.
This means that you don’t need to spend a lot of time or money to benefit from usability testing.
Usability testing sounds like a good idea, but you’re probably wondering if any affordable options exist.
The answer is yes. Plenty of free or cheap tools and services are available to help you test and optimize your site.
Here’s our selection of some of the best and most affordable options to get started with.
Userfly is an interesting new startup. The service allows you to put a little bit of JavaScript on your website and then track a lot of your visitors’ actions, from mouse movements to clicks and keystrokes (except password entries, of course).
This means that you can replay a user’s session exactly as it happened, and not just on a single page either, but across your entire site. You can see where the user’s mouse moved and exactly what they typed.
You can start using Userfly for free, with a limit of 10 captures. The Basic plan gives you 100 captures at $10 per month, which should be plenty to get you started.
Feedback Army is probably the fastest way to get feedback about your website (aside from asking your colleagues). This service is powered by Amazon’s Mechanical Turk engine.
As the name implies, Mechanical Turk is a human-powered “engine” designed to solve tasks that can be completed in a short period of time. Feedback Army asks users questions about your site and quickly gathers feedback and impressions so that you can improve the user experience.
The cost is relatively cheap: $10 buys you 10 responses. However, don’t expect detailed reviews. Also, it is important to construct your questions carefully to receive the highest quality and most effective feedback.
Five Second Test is a free usability testing service that offers three different ways of testing: “Classic,” “Compare,” and “Sentiment.” The Classic test shows and then hides a screenshot of your page and asks users to recall elements that they remember.
The Compare test shows two screenshots and asks users which they prefer. The Sentiment test shows one page and asks users to pick their favorite and least favorite elements.
As you can probably guess from the name, testers have only 5 seconds to provide feedback after seeing a question. Also, each test can be marked as public or invitation-only, which is helpful if you need to limit exposure.
UserTesting offers a more traditional approach to usability testing. Give UserTesting your website’s demographic, and the service will select the right users to browse your site.
In return, you’ll receive a video of the users’ screens as they navigate your site, along with a running audio commentary of their responses. You will also get a written report detailing the areas and functions that the users liked and disliked and anything that may have prompted them to leave the site.
All of this costs only $29 per test. Such low-cost and high-quality deliverables make UserTesting a great option for those looking to perform detailed tests of their websites, without having to resort to more expensive, comprehensive usability testing.
Similar to Userfly, ClickTale captures the actions of your website’s visitors, including clicks, scrolling, and keystrokes. Other features offered include a scrolling heat map, form analytics, and individual link analysis (e.g. how many clicks or hovers did each link get?).
ClickTale has a free plan that records 400 page views per month for one domain. Some of the features in the free plan are limited; for example, the scrolling heat map is available only for your most popular page.
Paid plans start at $99 a month, which is still a competitive price for the features that this service offers.
A good way to improve the performance of your website is to do A/B testing (also known as split testing). This means running two different versions of a particular page simultaneously for different users and recording how well each one converts.
A more advanced version of this test is called multivariate testing, in which a multitude of variables are tested to discover the best combination.
Google offers a tool to do exactly this: Google Website Optimizer. All you need to do is provide the various content elements (for example, different headlines or product pictures) and Google Website Optimizer will serve random combinations of them to your visitors while tracking how well each combination converts. Best of all, Google Website Optimizer is free to use.
ClickHeat is an interesting little tool that generates heat maps of all the clicks made on your website. You’ve probably seen heat maps generated by eye-tracking studies: this is the same concept, but for tracking clicks instead.
The service is free but needs to be downloaded and installed on a server, and so it has a couple of requirements, such as PHP support.
Chalkmark is a usability testing app currently offered as a free beta. Chalkmark allows you to set up a series of tests; for example, a user could be shown your landing page and be asked to perform a task, such as find the sign-up page.
The location(s) that the user clicks on are tracked. These targeted tests allow you to find out how easy certain tasks on your website are to perform and whether the navigation and information you provide are clear.
While using Chalkmark is free, you’ll still need to find people to perform the tests. However, because they are online, the tests can be completed very quickly, and so recruiting users should be much easier than in traditional user testing.
Simple Mouse Tracking is another free tool to track a visitor’s mouse movements and clicks on your site. You’ll need PHP on your server to run it, although the actual pages don’t have to be PHP-based; they just require a bit of JavaScript.
If you’re using a Mac, then there’s a great usability testing application called Silverback, which was created by the well-known design consulting firm Clearleft. It comes in handy for conducting in-person user testing.
Instead of having to set up a bunch of cameras and recording equipment, you simply need to have a Mac with an iSight camera. As in a traditional user test, you sit with the user in front of the computer and ask them to perform certain tasks, all while they say their thoughts aloud.
Silverback records a video of them and of what is happening on the screen. The app also has some useful note-taking functionality and lets you set chapter markers (using the Apple remote) when something interesting occurs during a session.
The application costs $49.95, which is a fair price for avoiding the hassle of setting up a user-testing environment.
Written exclusively for WDD by Dmitry Fadeyev. He runs a blog on usability called Usability Post.
Which tools do you use to run your usability tests? Please share your experience with the services mentioned or any others that you may use.
If you find an exclusive RSS freebie on this feed or on the live WDD website, please use the following code to download it: Z5DM2Q
25 June 2009, 7:18 am
Un rappel de principes de base et quelques règles simples pour réussir l’architecture d’un site internet à la fois pour les visiteurs et les moteurs… à l’heure ou beaucoup se posent des questions sur l’utilité de techniques de référencement comme le Page Rank Sculpting ou encore sur l’efficacité du “hoarding” ou du “siloing” …
Suite et source de l’article : http://blog.paradiseo.fr/referencement-architecture-site,112.html
24 June 2009, 2:55 pm
Design patterns were first described in the 1960s by Christopher Alexander, an architect who noticed that many things in our lives happen according to patterns. He adapted his observations to his work and published many findings on the topic. Since then, design patterns have found their place in many areas of our lives, and can be found in the design and development of user interfaces as well.
In short, design patterns are solutions to recurring problems. By extension, UI design patterns are solutions to common user interface problems. This article goes over 10 interesting UI design patterns that you can use in your own projects. In fact, you may already be using them now without knowing it.
You may be interested in the following related posts:
To fully appreciate the problem of registration, we should consider an annoyance that has led to the opinion that sign-up forms must die. This certainly doesn’t mean they should be completely omitted but rather that they should be only one part in the process of introducing users to a system, and should come late in the process. Such an approach is called “lazy registration” and relates to the account registration pattern.
When would you actually use lazy registration? Although it may seem like lazy registration could be used all the time, some circumstances are ideal:

Amazon lets you browse and add products to your shopping cart before signing up.
This pattern is meant to allow users to use your system and take action before registering. If satisfied with your service so far, users will regard this quick act of registration as just another small step in the entire process and not an obligation. The shopping cart is a good example of this pattern: users can browse and choose products and only have to register when they proceed to check out.

Picnik is another good example of lazy registration. Users can use all of the service’s functions to edit their photos online. They are asked to register only before saving their work.
This pattern is used to show only the information or features relevant to the user’s current activity and to delay other information until it is requested. By hiding more complex or infrequently used features, you de-clutter the user interface; by revealing them only as they are needed, you help users perform a complex, multi-step process on a single page.
The goal is to show only essential information in the first step and then invite users to take the next step. When the user completes a step, you reveal the information in the next step, keeping all previous steps visible. By keeping previous steps visible, you allow users to change what they have entered. And the data they input in the current step can affect the behavior of the next step.

Digg uses progressive disclosure in its comments section. Users can read a comment and, by clicking on the “Replies” link, see all of the replies to that comment. The link also tells you how many replies will be shown.

Once the replies are revealed, users can not only read them but also reply to and rate them. Comments below the viewing threshold are collapsed by default and are revealed by clicking “Show.”
Examples of progressive disclosure are everywhere. A simple “Show more” link that reveals more information is one of the simplest forms of progressive disclosure. But it can be used for more complex cases, such as filling out Web forms. Try to open an account on Picnik (which we mentioned in the lazy registration pattern) to see how progressive disclosure can be used at a more complex level.

YouTube uses progressive disclosure when users customize the look of the video player. When a user clicks the icon, customization features open up below.
Search functions can offer users various options and sometimes be complex. When searching weather and street maps, for example, users can use such criteria as city name, street name and zip code. To indicate to users that they can use several criteria, interfaces tend to show multiple options and become overly complex. Instead of adding clutter to the interface, use the forgiving format pattern, which lets users enter data in various formats and leaves it to the system to parse the data.

Yahoo weather search allows users to search by city or zip code.
To convey which formats are supported, give users hints on how to search, whether by listing all available formats, as in the example above, or by providing a link to a help page, as in the example below.

Google Maps allows users to search by city, street, zip code and even latitudinal and longitudinal values.
The forgiving format pattern significantly simplifies user interfaces. However, it may require a lot of work from back-end developers. The more options users have, the more difficult parsing becomes.
Simple Web forms often allow just one action (”Submit,” “Save” or “Send”). The user knows exactly what their final action in filling out the form will be, because they have only one option. However, users may sometimes be faced with several options and have to distinguish between primary and secondary actions.

Clearleft makes a distinction between primary and secondary actions with color.
What are primary and secondary actions? Primary actions lead to the completion of a form; for example, clicking “Save” or “Send.” Secondary actions usually do not lead to a form’s completion; these include clicking “Cancel.” There are exceptions, though. Which are the primary and secondary actions when you see “Save,” “Save and continue” and “Publish” buttons all in a row? When users have several options, highlighting primary actions and de-emphasizing secondary actions are good practice.
This can be done in two ways:

Flickr highlights the primary action by putting the secondary action in a small label below.
Both ways clearly distinguish between primary and secondary actions, relieving the user from having to think about which option to choose in order to complete their task.
Breadcrumbs show the path from the front page of the site to the current location of th users in the website’s page hierarchy. They are a form of secondary navigation that helps users understand the hierarchy and structure of the website. Breadcrumbs start with the home page and end with the page currently being viewed. Each label in a breadcrumb trail is linked to its respective page or section in the hierarchy, the exception being the one for the current page, which should just be an unlinked label.

Apple’s breadcrumbs are graphic elements that fit the overall design of the website well.
Breadcrumbs take up minimal space and are usually positioned at the top of the page, below the header and above the content. They would serve no purpose on the home page and so should not appear there. Breadcrumbs can appear simply as text links separated by the “>” sign, or they can be graphic elements, like the breadcrumbs on Apple’s website:
The definition of this pattern varies from place to place, but we can say that it solves three somewhat related problems:
The solution to allowing users to access protected content is to have them register for an account on the system and store their personal data, to be reused later. The benefits are numerous. For instance, users can be shown personalized offers, as seen on Amazon. Users could also perform tasks more efficiently if the system reused the information submitted during registration. Storing shipping details is just one example. Because filling out forms is not a favorite task of users, requiring only necessary information is important. Another important thing is to clearly highlight all of the benefits users will receive, so that they become more willing to register.

Vimeo has a simple but attractive sign-up form.

Tumblr requires only minimal information of the user to sign up.
Making the user interface obvious is essential. This applies just as much to Web forms. One of the best ways to make the interface of Web forms obvious is by marking required fields. The purpose of these markers is to alert the user to information they will need to provide. This way, users won’t feel they have to fill out the entire form to avoid seeing an error message.
Ideally, you should remove all optional fields and let the user type only the information that is necessary for the interaction. A rule of thumbs: the simpler and shorter a web form is, the better is the user experience. Another interesting idea is to make it possible for users to remove all optional fields – you can find more about how to implement it in practice (as well as a ready-to-be-used-script) in Andy Clarke’s article Trimming Form Fields.

Haveamint.com puts “Required” markers next to field labels on its contact form.
You can position required field markers in one of two places:
When deciding on which fields to require, take into account the total number of fields in the form. If the form is complex and most of its fields are required, the user will likely see it as unnecessary clutter.
This pattern is widely implemented when users have to fill in data in multiple steps. The purpose of this pattern is to:

StatementStacker clearly shows the number of steps and highlights the current step.
Steps are usually displayed horizontally and connected by arrows, showing the order in which the steps will be performed. Also, each step is usually marked with a large number and very concise description of what users should do in that step. The important thing here is consistency: a progress indicator should always appear in the same position across the pages and show users where they are at.
This pattern is usually combined with the well-known “wizard” pattern to create a multi-step process, such as for registration or a shopping cart.

Delicious has a good-looking progress indicator that clearly defines the purpose of each step. It also highlights the current step by displaying it in a different color.
This pattern is suitable if the website offers one product or service that comes in different plans and requires regular payments, usually monthly payments. Each plan should be descriptive and provide the following information:

Wufoo clearly shows its subscription plans, the prices and the differences between them.
Always show your plans in order. Plans are usually ordered from most to least expensive. You can highlight the plan you want users to buy by using a different color or size.

Crazyegg’s subscription table draws attention to the “Basic” plan.
When a user interface has many elements in which the user can perform actions, the page can become cluttered and hard to scan. This is especially common in the administration section of Web applications, where users can change table data. A good way to handle this is to hide each element and reveal it when the user hovers over that area.

An “Edit” link is revealed as the user hovers over each section of their Facebook profile page.
Hiding controls and revealing them on hover significantly de-clutters the user interface without taking away functionality.

Twitter reveals “Reply” and “Favorite” links when the user hovers over each tweet.
You may be interested in the following related posts:
Janko Jovanovic is a senior developer, Web designer and blogger. In his free time, he writes about Web development and design on his blog JankoAtWarpSpeed and tweets regularly on Twitter.
(al)
© Janko Jovanovic for Smashing Magazine, 2009. |
Permalink |
82 comments |
Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble on StumbleUpon! | Tweet it! | Submit to Reddit | Forum Smashing Magazine
Post tags: designs, Interface, patterns, ui
23 June 2009, 3:21 pm
L’opérateur de téléphonie mobile Movistar a voulu prouver que visionner une vidéo pouvait prendre le temps d’un feu rouge… et l’a démontré.
Marrant même s’il n’est pas forcément facile, à première vue, de comprendre le concept… C’est en fait une publicité alternative pour mettre en avant la rapidité de téléchargement offerte aux péruviens.
9 June 2009, 9:58 am
Detailed digital illustrations come in all shapes and sizes, and often make use of abstract shapes, flowing lines and bright colours. This collection of 50 inspiring abstract illustrations in web design showcases some of the best, eye popping designs out there on the net.
8 June 2009, 9:00 am
We love our readers. We respect the hard work of designers and developers across the globe. And we do our best to make the web design community stronger and the Web a little bit prettier. Therefore we ask talented artists and creative professionals to showcase their skills and release something unique and beautiful as a gift to the community. And when designers agree, truly impressive works see the light of day.
A couple of weeks ago we released DelliStore, a professional CSS/(X)HTML-template with PSD-sources. In the poll and in the comments to this post our readers asked for more (X)HTML/CSS-template, so here are 6 more professional template that you can use without any restriction for your private or commerical projects. The template were designed by Templateworld and released for free especially for Smashing Magazine and its readers.
The themes can be used and edited without any restrictions or limitations. Feel free to modify the templates in private or commercial projects – the templates are absolutely free to use.
From a long time we have been playing with the idea of creating a fusion design. Then we thought why not try a fusion between retro and contemporary design trends? Thus the ‘Shape’ template was born – an attempt to recreate the magic of the 70s while using a modern look. For this purpose we used typography and the Dahlia/Sunflower right in the centre to emphasize the retro look. The colour wheel behind the Dahlia/Sunflower is our view on changing times and colour preferences. Our love for nature shows through the entire design as we used a lot of green – in different shades, floral patterns and bamboo trees in the header.
That’s with the design. Coming to the page elements, the header section shows links to 8 pages, a registration, login and bookmarking link. The header also has an integrated search feature.
We wanted to have a distinct background colour for the company description and thus used black to make it look prominent. Then there is a news section, an awards column and a portfolio section. If you are one of those designers who have just too many designs to showcase, you can upload as many designs as you want as wehave provided a number of pages for it. The footer shows links to 8 pages.
The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
This template incorporates the look and feel of graffiti art. You will see the header section with a wall as the background. We have used a bright shade of green as we wanted this template to exude a certain amount of freshness. If you are wondering what the wheel is all about, it’s a wheel of latest projects/services by the company.
We have deliberately used a dark colour for the footer so as to make it conspicuous as it contains important information like latest projects worked on and the corresponding client testimonials. The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
We have always seen the game of chess as a very powerful game which requires immense intelligence and presence of mind on the part of the players. These little figures, though inanimate, look very powerful and mysterious. We used their images for the template to represent their power and mystery. ‘Artificial Casting’ shows the chess pieces ‘Knight’ and ‘Bishop’ standing aloof to show their sophistication and a sense of mystery.
The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
Nature has always fascinated us with its attractive and vibrant colours. The natural colour of fruits and vegetables is where we drew inspiration for the design of this template. Therefore, you will see that we have used tomato and kiwi to give the template a natural feel. We have placed two of the main sections of the page – ‘Who We Are’ and ‘Latest Events’ on these to draw the reader’s attention to it instantaneously.
The right navigation shows links to 8 pages. We have also placed a box advertising the latest jobs by the company. Then there is a section which shows links to the latest blog posts. The links have rollover effect. We have used separate boxes for Ideas, Sign-up and Blog so as it to give them distinctive. Just below that you will find a newsletter sign-up box through which readers can stay updated on the latest activities on the website and by the company.
There is a Features section which enlists all the features of the services by the company. Beside that you will also find a Member Login box and a contact number for quick contact. To balance the light colours usage, we have used a dark colour for the footer which shows 8 links.
The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
This template titled ‘Dusky’ is an illustration of the twilight which is our favourite time of the day. It is a time when the sky shows different hues of colour in a peaceful and serene setting. The sky bustling with chirping birds is also a treat to watch. We tried to replicate this beautiful part of the day in the template by using light shades of blue, green, and yellow and pictures of birds and sky.
The left navigation of the body area shows a User Login box and a Portfolio of projects. The users can browse through all the projects by clicking on Next. The right navigation provides information about new services and a Quick Contact box wherein users can enter their name and email ID to contact instantly. The central area provides a brief overview of the company.
The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
In this hustle bustle of life, we are always surrounded by people and our responsibilities and often long for solitude. This template, titled ‘Solitude’ depicts this reality of life. Solitude or quiet time has often been regarded as a blessing as this is the time when we think deeply, feel rejuvenated, and have our minds brimming with bright new ideas. If you are thinking that I am taking you on a spiritual realm, you are right! This is our intention through the template titled ‘Solitude’.
The header section shows a bird perched on a branch and looking upwards as if looking for inspiration. This is us, the designers who are always looking ahead for new ideas, inspiration and of course solitude! We used light colours and abstract art to complement the theme of the template.
The body shows a short description of the company, the services provided, and a testimonial column. The services column also shows the related icon. The right navigation shows a preview of photos by the company, a Quick Contact box, and Links to Projects completed.
The template code is validated by W3C and also conforms to Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for Accessible design.
Thank you, guys. We appreciate your work and your good intentions!
© Smashing Editorial for Smashing Magazine, 2009. |
Permalink |
149 comments |
Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble on StumbleUpon! | Tweet it! | Submit to Reddit | Forum Smashing Magazine
Post tags: downloads, free, Freebies, psds, templates, xhtml
4 June 2009, 1:11 pm
On vient de m’envoyer par email, cette candidature de stage que j’ai trouvé vraiment originale. Franck Joubert, son auteur, s’est vendu comme une application pour trouver un stage à New York. J’espère qu’il trouvera, j’ai bien aimé sa créativité.
3 June 2009, 5:17 pm
Templates are a handy resource for any apparel designer to mockup your awesome tee design and show it off in all its glory. Such resources can be a little tricky to come by, especially those high quality files, but check out this huge collection of T-Shirt mockup templates, featuring plenty of highly useful files in both vector and PSD format for use in your future apparel projects.
(Via Emptees)
(Via Emptees)
(Via Emptees)
(Via Emptees)
(Via Emptees)
(Via Emptees)
1 June 2009, 9:00 am
by Felix Ajenjo (illustration, typography, coffee, illustrate)
29 May 2009, 3:42 pm
Today we’re going to compare the websites of two monumental companies: Apple and Microsoft.
The two giants pride themselves for producing cutting edge consumer and business products, and are leading the developments in software and hardware.
But what about their websites? How do they both compare, and more important, which one is better and more usable?
Well, in this article we’ll take a look at both websites for closer examination from a usability point of view.
One important thing to note before we proceed to compare these two websites is that each company’s business revolves around different markets.
Microsoft primarily makes its profits from business to business, which mainly consists of selling licenses to its operating system to computer manufacturers and office suites for enterprises.
That’s not to say that they don’t sell to consumers — they do, and they have consumer only product lines as well, such as the Xbox gaming console, and of course home users also buy Windows and Office. This means that their business targets pretty much everyone, from home computer owners to developers and enterprises; which in turn stretches the purpose of their website to try and serve everyone.
On the other hand, Apple is primarily a consumer company, and makes most of its profit selling hardware, like its iPod music players and Mac computers. This makes the target of Apple’s site much clearer — marketing, selling and providing support for its products to consumers.
They don’t have to worry about selling licenses to manufacturers because they’re the only manufacturer, so the key purpose of the website would be to advertise and promote their multiple product lines, as well as selling them through their online store.
The homepage is one of the most important pages of the whole site because it’s the first, and in many cases the only chance you get to impress the visitor enough to keep them browsing. You’ve got a few seconds to convince them that the site has enough value for them to keep using it, because if it doesn’t, the visitors will leave.
Apple’s approach to the homepage has been consistent throughout all the years that the site has been running. They use this page as a kind of advertising board that always shows a big ad of their latest product, followed by 3 other ads to another 3 products or news that is important at the moment.
If you’re not interested in any of the 4 suggested items, you can use the large navigation bar at the top, which is split into their core businesses: Mac, iPod and iPhone, followed by a couple of other important links, such as the online store and support pages. The navigation bar also incorporates a search field.
The interesting thing here is that the main ad at the top is huge — indeed it almost covers the entire page. If this doesn’t grab your attention then nothing will. Apple knows the importance of getting the customer’s attention using good marketing, so they’re not afraid to really go for it.
One other thing to note is the lack of content. You’re not distracted by sidebars, notices or extra navigation items — there are only a few items on the page, focusing your attention and making the decision of where to go next easier.
Microsoft has a different approach to their homepage. Firstly, they feature a similar style of ad at the top, designed to be attention grabbing. These are large images, but only one out of 3 ads is shown at a time — you have to hover over the other two to expand them. This focuses attention, but may potentially weaken the effectiveness of the two hidden ads since the visitor has to work to see them. Right at the top of the page is the navigation, together with search.
What’s below the main ads is more interesting though. As I mentioned previously, Microsoft’s business operates in many markets, including both business to business and business to consumer.
The space below acts as a set of highlights and news for these various areas of the business. One big problem with the content featured here is that it’s fairly boring and overwhelming, with a lot of information packed into a very small space, without anything try to make it scannable.
Sure, it’s broken down into bullet points, but the font is small and there are hardly any images to differentiate between the items. As it stands, there is little to attract me to make me want to read through this content because it’s just, well… boring.
What I mean by flow is this: is the site structured and laid out in such a way that I can easily find items to focus on? Do I know what to read after I focus on those items — is the site design directing me across the page with less effort on my part, or do I have to work to try and navigate around the content to find what I need?
Here’s the MobileMe section on Apple.com:
I think Apple has done a great job at structuring all of their pages. Here, the first thing you focus on is probably the picture on the right and then the large headline on the left.
After you’ve read the headline you can proceed to read the marketing blurb below, which leads nicely into a call to action signup button for the free trial. If you’re not interested in the trial, there are more features below to persuade you, each one ending with a “Learn more” link to a more detailed feature page. This leaves no dead ends and keeps the user browsing.
Microsoft seems hit and miss in this department. Here’s the SharePoint section:
Yes, there is a focal point at the top that grabs your attention — the large quote and the image of a server — but what’s next?
All of the content below is extremely monotonous, especially the “Learn More” box with a list of 8 links. The dry presentation gives the user less incentive to click around. Some Microsoft sites use better layout to direct the flow of attention, but they generally all suffer from the same illness: too much content.
When you present the user with too many choices, you make them work — they have to think about what they want and they have to process more information. By reducing choice, Apple directs the users through a more carefully designed funnel, which generally delivers a better experience.
Apple’s website has a large navigation bar at the top, which remains there consistently whichever section of the site you go to.
The options available show the main sections split by its lines of business as well as a couple of essentials, such as support and the store. The bar also integrates search and branding as the home button displays the Apple logo instead of a label.
Any extra sub-navigation is located on individual site pages and is placed within the context of that page, whether on a sidebar, or as a horizontal bar at the top.
Microsoft has a similar navigation bar on the homepage, but that navigation bar is not consistent across the site. Actually, all of the sub-pages tend to use their own navigation bar, in style and in content. The homepage navigation thus acts as a site map to the rest of the Microsoft website sections.
In a lot of the navigation bars, including the one on the homepage, Microsoft uses drop-down menus — unlike Apple. They don’t just use drop-down menus — they use huge drop-down menus. In some cases, the menu even has a scrollbar (in Firefox):
Is this good or bad? In a recent Alertbox entry, Jakob Nielsen, a well known usability guru, has written that mega drop-down menus can work.
They work because they present a lot of choices in groups, so they allow for easier scanning as you can jump to the group that you want and scan the items inside them. You have to get certain things right though, like the order of the groups and only mentioning each element once, for them to work well.
In this case, I think it makes sense for Microsoft to go the route of the drop-down menus, but I feel that they may have gone a little too far. For example, some options point to the same thing, like the ‘Office’ drop down and ‘Office’ option in the ‘All Products’ drop down.
The drop-down also blocks the content below, so if you accidentally moused over the menu, you have to mouse off from it again to get to the content below — all the while being careful not to hover over other items.
There are also a lot of options under each group — sometimes showing about 13 items, which makes processing the options much more difficult. Also, the inconsistency of navigation across the different sections makes it much harder to jump from one area of the site to another, e.g from the Office site to the Xbox site.
Because most of the content on the sites is text, it’s vital to ensure that everything is readable and legible. Here are the main things to consider when working on readability of your site’s content:
Let’s see how Microsoft and Apple fare in this area. Here’s a typical page on the Apple.com website:
Apple does a great job of keeping everything easy to read. The text is generally small, but never too small so as to be a problem. Headings are set in heavier type and stand out, allowing you to quickly get the gist of each section.
Apple also makes heavy use of white space to separate everything apart and adds images to make each text blurb more interesting.
Here’s a typical page from Microsoft.com from the Windows section:
It follows the general usability guidelines by breaking things down into small bite size pieces of text that are easy to digest. It looks a lot busier than the Apple site because there is more content on one page and there are many different treatments for headings and highlighted words.
Too much variety causes visual chaos on the page, with each different colored or bold item competing for your attention. In this case, the page really needs to be simplified to make it easier for the viewer to process.
Here’s another page, this time from the Microsoft security section:
The text on this page is probably a little too small to be comfortable to read, and the site needs more white space around the content to separate the text. Let’s see what a really busy page on Apple’s site looks like:
This is the Apple store. Really busy with lots of products and category links everywhere. Fonts get pretty small to allow more content to fit in, although good use of white space ensures things are still usable.
Apple’s search is integrated into the navigation bar. When you type something in the search box you actually get live search results with AJAX, by way of a little box which pops up, showing you the results as you type.
It’s very well done — there is no lag when typing, the results are grouped in categories and are fetched very quickly, usually before you finish typing your full query. Here’s what it looks like:
If you want to see more results you can just hit Enter when you’ve finished typing and you’ll be taken to the standard search results page. It’s very clean and organized by categories.
You can drill the results further down by category, selectable from the menu on the right. It’s functional and clean, and works well when you’re trying to find any products that they sell.
Microsoft has a more familiar search results page that looks a lot like Google (or any other search engine these days).
That’s because it uses Microsoft’s own Live search engine. It’s certainly good at finding what you’re looking for and got the results that I wanted. The format of the results is one big list, which makes sense for Microsoft because of the nature of their business, with a lot of sub-pages and different content to search through.
It’s functional, but the look and feel is different to the other pages, which makes it look like you’re browsing a different website.
Apple’s website aesthetics closely mirrors that of its product line. The navigation bar looks like it’s crafted out of aluminum and features gentle gradients and indented text.
There are also plenty of reflections and minimalist design elements. Apple has always worked on unifying the look and feel of its interface across its entire product line, from the hardware to software, and their website is no exception.
Do aesthetics have anything to do with usability? Actually, they do. Research shows that people perceive better looking interfaces as more usable.
Attractive interfaces will set better first impressions and may even make their users more tolerable to problems. So how does Microsoft fare in the aesthetics department? Here’s the Internet Explorer 8 page:
The site follows a faint Windows theme with the light blue clouds, but there is little else to say that this is a page for Internet Explorer or Windows.
The look and feel is very generic and doesn’t do enough to differentiate itself or build a coherent brand. Here’s another page; this is the Download Center:
Again, we have a completely different design, although the light blue color is used here too for the backgrounds. If there was no title on the page, could you tell that this is a Microsoft or Windows page? Probably not.
The designs are overall pretty good, but pretty good just isn’t enough. There are plenty of inconsistencies and a lack of polish, which puts Apple ahead in this area.
Consistency is important because it allows you to develop usage patterns. This basically means that if your site has a consistent interface throughout, your visitors will quickly learn how it works and will be able to use this knowledge in any of the new pages that they visit, since they’ll all be using the same, or very similar, interface.
Apple does a great job of keeping the interface consistent. All of the product pages feature very similar aesthetics and are structured in the same way.
The whole site looks and feels the same throughout and the global navigation bar at the top is always there, on every page. This means that the entire experience is very unified and coherent — you know you’re on the same website wherever you go.
Here’s a Microsoft page for the Azure platform:
Could you tell that this is a Microsoft page if you took away their logo? Custom graphics, styles and color palettes across all the Microsoft sections help little to maintain a coherent brand image on the web.
Microsoft really struggles here. There are many different sections across Microsoft.com and they all feature their own look and feel, including their own navigation.
So once you go to a section on their site, be it the Microsoft store, the Office site, or the Security pages, they will all look and feel like separate websites.
What’s worse, the global navigation bar is also gone, meaning that you have to go back to the homepage, or the site map, to see an overview of all of their sites. It’s really an ecosystem of websites hosted under the same domain and therefore it doesn’t get the benefit of consistency that Apple has. The brand image is also terribly fragmented making it impossible to define what a Microsoft site looks like.
Which site is the winner? If you’re looking at usability alone, Apple comes out ahead. They have a better designed homepage that offers less choice, which means the user needs to think less.
They have consistent navigation across all of their pages. They use a lot of white space and sub-headings to make everything more readable, yet they keep things simple by not overusing too many different text treatments.
The Apple site is generally more user friendly and offers a much better experience to consumers who use it to check out Apple’s latest products.
Having said this, the Apple website is much smaller in scale than Microsoft’s site. Unlike Apple, Microsoft hosts many different sites and sections under the Microsoft.com brand, creating a whole ecosystem of sub-sites. Each site is packed with information and the Live powered search that Microsoft offers tends to yield good results. The biggest problem for Microsoft is consistency.
Microsoft just doesn’t have a consistent, coherent and unified brand. Every section looks and feels different. There is no global navigation and there are not many visual clues that tell the user that this is a Microsoft site — unlike Apple, where the whole site shares one unique aesthetic that mirrors that of their hardware and software, thus creating a powerful brand.
For these reasons, I think Apple is the clear winner here.
Written exclusively for WDD by Dmitry Fadeyev. He runs a blog on usability called Usability Post.
What do you think? Have we got it right? We’d love to read your thoughts and comments, so go ahead and leave us a comment below…
If you find an exclusive RSS freebie on this feed or on the live WDD website, please use the following code to download it: w7Zh5G
29 May 2009, 3:56 am
Vous ne savez jamais qui fait quoi, qui est qui ?
Benjamin a dégoté ce dessin :
Plus le droit à l’erreur ;).
26 May 2009, 9:15 pm
Vous pensiez que le plus petit hélicoptère radicommandé du monde était le PicooZ ou ses concurrents directs ?
Il va falloir revoir vos manuels de vol : voici le Hornet-3 PD-100 de chez Prox Dynamics, un mini-hélico qui présente en outre des caractéristiques bien plus pointues que les deux précédents, le rapprochant davantage d’un redoutable appareil à usage professionnel (visite sécurisée de zones contaminées, armées…) que d’un jouet de salon.

Car, en plus de capacités de vol et une précision de pilotage sans commune mesure avec nos jouets préférés (30 km/h en vitesse de pointe !), le Hornet-3 est équipé d’une caméra embarquée le transformant en un mini-drone de la taille d’une grosse libellule, volant dans un silence presque complet au-delà de 3 mètres de distance. A défaut de pouvoir voler, voilà de quoi le faire par procuration, l’œil rivé sur le moniteur de contrôle qui retransmet en direct ce que l’appareil voit du haut de son capteur à hélices.
Si l’on se fie aux indications fournies sur le site de Prox Dynamics, la commercialisation de ces petits bijoux devrait débuter en 2011. Pas sûr qu’ils soient disponibles auprès du grand public.
Articles sur le même sujet :
Article original écrit par Eric et publié sur Presse-Citron, le 25/05/2009. |
Lien direct vers cet article |
Si vous lisez cet article dans son intégralité sur un autre site que Presse-Citron c'est qu'il a été reproduit illégalement et sans autorisation. Merci de le signaler à son auteur original en cliquant ici | © Presse-citron.net - 2009
25 May 2009, 9:14 am

Donate a meal : Un établissement à but caritatif en Allemagne qui vise à donner aux enfants de quoi manger correctement. Nul prouesse technologique mais un usage de la vidéo interactive en rapport direct au sujet, produisant un sentiment étrange et destabilisant, que l’on pourrait retrouver plus souvent dans les campagnes humanitaires.
L’immersion est rendue par la présence d’un enfant en face de nous, en vue à la première personne, renforcée par la bande sonore, qui encore une fois, joue un rôle fort important. C’est très très simple, mais extrêmement efficace à l’arrivée.
25 May 2009, 8:27 am

Fontex, es otra maravillosa galería de tipografías donde podrán descargar tantas fuentes gratuitas como deseen. Se encuentran categorizadas según su estilo o bien mediante su nombre, lo que puede ser útil en c aso de recordar el nombre de alguna fuente en particular. Como es costumbre en estos sitios, podrán ver las fuentes previamente antes de ser descargadas.
Enlace Fontex
Fuente kabytes
21 May 2009, 4:59 am
To me, Icons are up there with Fonts as some sort of design crack. I’m not sure when I got hooked, but it’s been a while now and my hard drive is crammed with icon sets of all shapes and varieties. So when we launched GraphicRiver a couple months ago there was no question as to whether we’d have an icon section. Even though it’s still early days there are already a ton of great icon sets, and in this post I thought I’d showcase a few of the best, starting with WeFunction’s massive 275 icon set!






























To celebrate the launch of GraphicRiver’s new Print Design Templates category we’re putting on a whole week of graphic design tutorials on both Psdtuts+ and Vectortuts+. The new category means you can now sell your design work to make extra cash On the flip side if you’re coming up short on inspiration, you can get a kickstart by grabbing a Photoshop, Illustrator or InDesign template via GraphicRiver. So to give the new category the launch it deserves, all this week we’ll be bringing you articles and tutorials just like this one, on graphic design as part of our Tuts+ Graphic Design Week.
20 May 2009, 7:30 am
Constrains like limited space and behavioral changes like cooking while entertaining have dictated the transition from monstrous-sized kitchens to neat compact kitchenettes and open modular concepts. Adopting these changes, Electrolux brings to us to two unique concepts. The Rendez-vous interactive table is a cook-top that allows you to do jiffy cooking and entertain at the same time. The Volare, akin to the Lounge Bar, is a wall mounted appliance that’s nothing short of an artistic kitchen! Check out the details after the jump.
Rendez-vous




You’re the sort who likes to interact with family and friends while cooking; then the Rendez-vous is just for you. It’s an intuitive table that features a unique energy shield that brings the appliances to life without having to plug them in. For instance, by simply placing the blender on the surface you can work it or charge it. Needless to say inductive and sensor technologies support the random cooking zones. Modular drawers that can hold stoves or refrigerator are accommodated beneath the table and can be tucked away, when you need to use the table for dining. A virtual chef that guides you through your cooking completes this futuristic package.
Volare




Like I said, this reminds me of the Lounge Bar, only this time it’s a complete kitchen on the wall! Ideal for space-crunch situations. Main highlights of this art piece are: modular system that allows customization; foldable induction stove; holds all modern appliances like an ice dispenser, tea/coffee unit and oven. The coolest thing about Volare is that its exteriors can come in many painted finishes; hence the accompanying spotlights can make the unit look like a piece of wall art when not being used as a kitchen.
Designer: Electrolux Global Design
Electrolux Global Design20 May 2009, 5:48 am
19 May 2009, 9:40 am
In this Illustrator CS4 tutorial I’ll show you how to create an Identity Package including: business cards, letterhead, and envelopes, all in Illustrator. In the tutorial you will set up your document, design the identity package, and learn best practices for proofing and sending to the printer. This tutorial will focus more on setting up your document to create this package, rather than focusing on the creative aspects of the design.
Below is the final image we will be working towards. Want access to the full Vector Source files and downloadable copies of every tutorial, including this one? Join Vector Plus for just 9$ a month.

Before we start, I would like to give a couple of explanations on the tutorial. You might be wondering why I am using Illustrator, a vector art editor, instead of a page layout program like InDesign to layout the identity package.
For me, using Illustrator CS4’s multiple artboards I can easily see how each piece of the collateral works together, helping with consistency and productivity as well as quickly exporting the artwork for proofing and printing. Also to note, I am using standard US document sizes for this tutorial. This also means that all measurements are going to be in inches. Still, it is easy to use the tutorials techniques for the metric system or other measurement systems as well.
To start, I am going to use an existing logo that I created for a fictional Illustration business called Vector Mill. I won’t go into to much detail on how I created the logo, just a quick breakdown.
Basically, I used different font weights of the Museo Sans font, Outlined the text, filled the text with a linear gradients, and used the Pen Tool (P) and Rectangle Tool (M) to create the Bézier curve part of the logo.

After you have your logo created and open, select all the artwork and drag it into the Symbols panel. With the Symbol dialog open, check the Graphic radial button and press OK.
We don’t necessarily have to create a symbol out of the logo, it is just good practice for repeating objects in documents. Using Symbols will save size and time within Illustrator documents. For example, if you wanted to slightly change the Vector Mill logo after we have created the whole identity package, you would only have to change the original Symbol (double-click on a Symbol in the document to edit it) and Illustrator will modify all instances of the Symbol.
Also, using symbols helps with reducing file size. It wouldn’t matter that much in the document we are creating, but it is good to keep in mind when creating other larger documents.

Next, we are going to create a bleed for all artboards that we’ll created in this tutorial. To do this, go to File > Document Settings, fill the first Bleed field with .125 inches and make sure the lock icon is pressed to the right of the Bleed fields so the Top measurement populates the other fields. Most printers require at least an eighth inch bleed, but be sure to check with you printer and see if they require more.

Create a 3.5 inch wide by 2 inch tall rectangle with the Rectangle Tool Outside of the logo artboard. This will be a business card.

With the rectangle selected, go to Object > Path > Offset. With the Offset dialog open, change the radius to -.25 inches. This offset shape will be converted into a guide for the live area of the business card. I like to keep a quarter of an inch within the trim edge of the business card. You can change this if you think that is to far inset or if the printer has a specific live area they work with.

Select the first rectangle and go to Object > Convert to Artboards. As you can see, the rectangle turned into an artboard and already has a bleed applied to it because we changed the document settings earlier.

Select the offset rectangle and go View > Guides > Make (Command + 5), creating guides so it’s easy to line up elements within the artboard.

In the Vector Mill example, I have a two-sided business card. It is easy to duplicate the business card artboard with the Artboard Tool (Shift + O). Before you copy, go to View > Guides > Lock Guides and make sure it is unchecked because we want to copy the guide as well.
Now, with the Artboard Tool (Shift + O) select the business card artboard and hold down Alt (to copy) and Shift (to constrain movements) and drag a copy of the artboard below the original.

Now we can start designing the business cards. For the first side of the cards, I dragged out the logo symbol from the Symbol panel and adjust the size to fit with the business card guides we created.

I won’t go into depth about creating the graphics for the second side of the business card, just give you a quick breakdown of the steps. Again, this tutorial focuses more on setting up Illustrator for creating an identity package, than creating graphics.
First, create a shape with the Pen Tool (P) making sure that the object extends past the the artboard edge to the bleed guide, then fill it with a linear gradient. Next, create text boxes that align to the business card guide, and fill in the text boxes with appropriate text. Like in the logo, I used varying weights of the Museo Sans font.

Now that we have created a look for the business cards, we can create a letterhead design with the same kind of style. First create a 8.5 inch by 11 inch (standard letterhead size) rectangle outside of the logo and business card artboards.

Just like the business cards, go to Object > Offset, and change the offset to -.25.

Again like the business card artboards, select the first rectangle and go to Object > Convert to Artboards. Then, select the second rectangle and go to View > Guides > Make (Command + 5). Now we have an artboard all ready to design.

Like with the business cards, drag a copy of the logo from the Symbol panel, size the logo. Create the same linear gradient arc shape with the Pen Tool (P), and create a text box with the appropriate text.

Now that you have the basic principles down on how to create an artboard and guides, you can create other elements of the identity package. In the Vector Mill example, I have to create a standard #10 envelope.
So for the envelope design, create a 9.5 inch wide by 4.125 inch tall (standard #10 envelope size) rectangle, offset the rectangle by -.25 inches. Convert the main rectangle to artboard, convert the interior rectangle to guides, use the logo symbol from the Symbol panel. Create the same linear gradient arc shape, and add the necessary text. We’re all done with creating the collateral!

Now that all the pieces are together, I like to create a single preview sheet of all the collateral together, like in the final image preview above.
To do this create a 8.5 inch by 11 inch rectangle and Offset the rectangle by -.25. Convert the first rectangle to an artboard, and convert the smaller rectangle to a guide. Next, create a rectangle the size of your new document and fill it with a light gray.

Drag a copy of the logo from the Symbols panel and title the page with appropriate text.

Next, create a rectangle with a white fill and no stroke over all the identity pieces the exact size of the individual artboards (except the logo artboard). For example, create a rectangle over the business card that is 3.5 inches wide by 2 inches tall.
Once created, select all the rectangles and Copy (Command + C). With the rectangles still selected, go to Object > Arrange > Send to Back (Command + Shift + Left Bracket key). The white rectangle will act like the white of the paper the collateral will be printed on. If you are printing on different colored papers, just change the color of these white rectangles. Next, Paste in Front (Command + F) the copied rectangles.

Now we are going to mask out the artwork for each piece. Start by selecting all the artwork in the letterhead artboard with the Selection Tool (V). Once all the artwork is selected go to Object > Clipping Mask > Make.

Repeat the previous step with all the other pieces in the package.

Select all you masked pieces and Copy (Command + C) and Paste (Command + V) them on the preview artboard we created a couple of steps ago. As you can see, the copies won’t fit on the page. So with the copied pieces selected, use the Selection Tool (V) and hold down Shift to scale the pieces. Next, arrange the documents in an order that appeals to you.

Now we can add a little drop shadow to the pieces to distinguish them from each other. To do this, select all the pieces on the preview sheet and go Effect > Stylize > Drop Shadow. WIth the Drop Shadow dialog open, change the Opacity to 30 the X Offset to 0, the Y Offset to .01, and the Blur to .01.

Now the identity package is done, we can export the documents for client proofing. I find that sending PDF to clients yields the best results for proofing. Before we save the PDF, it is a good idea to save a native Illustrator file.
Next, go File > Save As, locate the folder you want to save the PDF in, and change the name of your file. On the bottom of the Save As dialog, pick Adobe PDF for the format and make sure the All radial button in checked. This will save a PDF of all the artboards as pages in the new PDF document. You can also just choose a specific artboard if you want to create a PDF of single or multiple pages. Next, click Save.

Once in the Save Adobe PDF dialog, by default you are on the General tab of the Save Adobe PDF dialog. In this page, you don’t have to worry about much except the Preserve Illustrator Editing Capabilities. This is nice to enable, just in case you loose the original Illustrator file.
Now, click on the Marks and Bleeds Tab of the dialog and make sure the Use Document Bleed Settings check box is unchecked under the Bleeds section. Now go to the Security tab of the dialog. This part is optional, but I like to add some basic security to the PDF so the client doesn’t try to use, edit, or print, the proof without paying for the work first! I usually check the “Use a password to restrict editing Security and Permissions settings” and type in a password I will remember.
I also usually change the Printing Allowed to Low Resolution at the very least. Moreover, I also change the Changes Allowed section to “Inserting, deleting , and rotating of page,” but you can look through the list and see what works for you. Again, this is optional, but a good defense for creating a high-quality proof without client or other people stealing your work.
Finally, press Save PDF and if you put a password on the file, you will be prompted to enter it again. The only bad part about using Illustrator’s artboards, is you can’t rearrange the numbering of the artboards. If you want the preview sheet we created to be at the start of the PDF document, you will have to rearrange the pages in Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Once you have gotten final approval on the collateral, it is time to send it to print. Most printer will except PDF or EPS file format. Moreover, using the vector art in EPS and PDF files, create clean and crisp printing.
When you export the files for print, you are probably not going to need the logo artboard or the preview artboard, but before we export the files, you need to unmask all the clipping mask on the artboards (except the preview artboard). Simply select all these pieces (except the preview page) and go to Object > Clipping Mask > Release. If you want, you can delete all the white rectangles and mask rectangles to clean up your file.

For a PDF export, go to File > Save As, choose your folder and file name, choose Adobe PDF for Format, check the Range radial button, enter the Range of artboards you want to save, and press Save.
Once in the Save Adobe PDF dialog, the only setting you need to worry about is under the Marks and Bleeds tab. Under the Marks and Bleeds tab, make sure the Use Document Bleed Settings is checked and press Save PDF.

For an EPS export, go to File > Save As, choose your folder and file name, choose Illustrator EPS for Format, check the Use Artboards checkbox, check the Range radial button, enter the Range of artboards you want to save, and press Save.
Once in the EPS Options, make sure you save to a EPS version the printer can open and press OK. Now if you look in the folder you saved the file in, you will see each identity piece saved as an individual file.

Again below is a final image of all the artboards and the preview image we put together.

To celebrate the launch of GraphicRiver’s new Print Design Templates category we’re putting on a whole week of graphic design tutorials on both Psdtuts+ and Vectortuts+. The new category means you can now sell your design work to make extra cash On the flip side if you’re coming up short on inspiration, you can get a kickstart by grabbing a Photoshop, Illustrator or InDesign template via GraphicRiver. So to give the new category the launch it deserves, all this week we’ll be bringing you articles and tutorials just like this one, on graphic design as part of our Tuts+ Graphic Design Week.
19 May 2009, 8:00 am
As the effectiveness and streamlined approach of an online presence continues to become the primary means of business communication, a businesses brand relies heavily on how a logo interfaces with its website.
We’ll explore a variety of issues related to working with and integrating logos, including effective and ineffective combinations and how logos presented online differ from their printed counterparts. In addition, we’ll discuss what makes a logo successful from a usability and technical standpoint.
Skype is an online service where users can talk online, instant message and do video calls for free (or a small fee in some cases). Skype’s main focus is connecting friends and family online. When visitors interact with their brand it’s all online. Having said that, their logo is mostly viewed with a 3D or beveled effect, while the flat blue color is reserved for other applications that may not allow for subtle color changes. These instances occur generally when it comes to printed pieces like fax sheets, embroidered clothing, etched surfaces and vinyl lettering.
It’s fair to say that the primary look Skype wants their visitors to observe is the beveled version of the logo. This version has a softer and more approachable appeal that works in more situations than not, from a usability standpoint, given their business model.

Digg is an online platform where users can vote or digg interesting stories.
Digg has a range of styles and icons that denote its brand. Unlike Skype who’s primary logo is fairly consistent wherever it occurs, Digg’s implementation is unique and varied. The homepage of Digg uses a reversed (white) logo.
Digg has expanded the visuals that visitors associate with them by using other icons and not their logo, to identify themselves. When someone wants to "Digg" an article, story, photo, or other, they don’t see a picture of the Digg logo, rather, they see a number that denotes how many diggs that particular entry has, while the word "digg" is written small and underneath the number (see 1).
With a site that is as popular as Digg, it’s hard to control the use of its visual assets. People alter company logos on a regular basis, which generally dilutes the effectiveness of a strong brand. It’s common to see custom icons and art that may or may not look professional that represent a company we recognize. Digg is rare in the fact that they welcome visitors to alter some of the visual assets that represent them. The digg shovel icon (see 2) is one of these examples. Digg openly allows modification of this icon to suit a website’s need as indicated here.
The full color Digg logo (see 3) is used in a different capacity, not necessarily less frequently but not as the primary identifier it prefers it’s visitors to see, judging by the lack of use on one of the most prominent places one would see it, the website or underneath the Digg buttons.
Firefox is a popular web browser. In fact, most of your are probably reading this article with it!
Firefox is another great example of a product that may have occasional printed documents (perhaps on the corporate level) while their primary function is completely online. When a person wants to use Firefox they click on a full color and gorgeous Firefox icon. Once inside the application you don’t see the Firefox logo anymore.

With this in mind, lets switch to how the logos use translates to advertising. The Firefox logo in its entirety (see 1) is comprised of the icon and the text. In instances where the icon itself is not used they simply write the word "Firefox" (see 2.) Versions 3 and 4 are simply reversed to work where the background is too similar or creates an unpleasant combination with the orange text. You’ll never see an official version of the word "Firefox" written in another color.

One Here One There (OHOT) is a non-profit that fosters growth in sub-Saharan Africa through education. The OHOT brand gains support and awareness more equally (compared to the examples above) both online and in print. Since this is the case, the OHOT logo needed to remain largely consistent throughout the campaign. The OHOT logo below uses only two colors, green and gray. As OHOT is a non-profit organization it makes use of limited colors in their logo which in turn will save them money on printed pieces.

The OHOT website uses the logo in an unaltered form on a pale yellow background. Again, as the use of the logo equally spans print and online applications OHOT’s logo remains constant.
Below is a printed ad that incorporates a reversed version of the logo. Not much has changed.

This bench advertisement treats the logo in a similar, though creative manner.

OHOT logo and campaign designed by and courtesy of Carl Vervisch.
As a major source of information, a website is a cornerstone of a successful brand image. It’s critical that your logo work well no matter if it’s simple, 3D, ornate, extravagant, etc.
Take for example the famous MGM logo shown below. This logo has been around for many years and is in and of itself a nice looking logo. On the other hand, the implementation into the website is less than ideal. Observe how the drop shadow is too heavy and impedes the legibility of the logo. It would have been much more effective to eliminate the drop shadow and experiment with changing the background color, at least directly behind the logo.
It’s important that your online presence portrays the image you intend to convey. In MGM’s case, the website is a major source of information, but more people see the logo on the big screen rather than at their website.
The most important concept to absorb is that a logo should work well no matter the circumstance. If you keep this concept in the back of your mind as you craft the logo, the end result will be one that works for years to come in both digital and printed form.
Below are a few resources that I’ve found helpful when it comes to getting inspiration or executing any of the steps that creating a logo entails.
Identityworks has a variety of information on branding, logos, logo re-designs and more. Follow the link to see how companies use guidelines to keep their brand looking visually consistent.
Veer is a stock photography site that has a large selection of high-quality fonts to peruse and purchase when you’re looking for that perfect font for your logo. Even better is that you can typeset your own letters to see what they look like in a particular font.
One of the biggest advantages of purchasing a font is that it limits the number of people who are using the same font in their logo. If you’re looking for something that’s a little more exclusive, then this is the way to go.
Fawnt has some trendy and unique fonts that are free to download. Check out the font called Diavlo, it’s pretty cool.
Kuler is Adobe’s online tool for picking color combinations. Users can create their own combination using a variety of sliders and options. You can download color palettes that other users have made directly into your Adobe Application.
TIP: In Illustrator CS3 go to Window > Adobe Labs > Kuler to open the palette that interfaces with the website.
Check out Davidairey.com to add a little humor to your day, check out the article below. There are also loads of great logo design articles and resources on the site.
To celebrate the launch of GraphicRiver’s new Print Design Templates category we’re putting on a whole week of graphic design tutorials on both Psdtuts+ and Vectortuts+. The new category means you can now sell your design work to make extra cash On the flip side if you’re coming up short on inspiration, you can get a kickstart by grabbing a Photoshop, Illustrator or InDesign template via GraphicRiver. So to give the new category the launch it deserves, all this week we’ll be bringing you articles and tutorials just like this one, on graphic design as part of our Tuts+ Graphic Design Week.
19 May 2009, 7:30 am